Nissan Qashqai 2013 vs Hyundai ix35 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 135 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 165 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 seconds | 11.1 seconds | |
| Nissan Qashqai engine produces 5 HP less power than Hyundai ix35, but torque is 155 NM more than Hyundai ix35. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.6 | 6.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.8 l/100km | 8.4 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Qashqai is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Qashqai consumes 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai ix35, which means that by driving the Nissan Qashqai over 15,000 km in a year you can save 270 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Qashqai consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai ix35. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1190 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| 1300 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
| 800 km with real consumption | 650 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan Qashqai gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Hyundai ix35 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 16 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Renault Scenic, Renault Megane | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Kia Sportage, Kia Ceed, Hyundai Tucson, Hyundai Elantra, Hyundai i30 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Hyundai ix35 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Nissan Qashqai engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Nissan Qashqai 2013 1.6 engine: This 1.6-liter diesel engine is a joint development by Renault-Nissan engineers. It features a cast-iron block, a 16-valve cylinder head with hydraulic lifters, a chain-driven timing system, and a Bosch Common ... More about Nissan Qashqai 2013 1.6 engine Hyundai ix35 2013 1.6 engine: The engine is generally a reliable design and not particularly sensitive to fuel quality. However, it is prone to several common issues. One of the most widespread problems is the rapid buildup of carbon ... More about Hyundai ix35 2013 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.41 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.59 m | 1.67 m | |
|
Nissan Qashqai is smaller. Nissan Qashqai is 3 cm shorter than the Hyundai ix35, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Qashqai is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 591 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1585 litres | 1436 litres | |
| Nissan Qashqai has 161 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai ix35. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Qashqai (by 149 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Qashqai is 0.1 metres more than that of the Hyundai ix35. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`005 | 1`830 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Nissan Qashqai has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Hyundai ix35 has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Nissan Qashqai, so Nissan Qashqai quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 10 000 | 9600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Qashqai has
|
Hyundai ix35 has
| |