Nissan Qashqai 2013 vs Audi Q3 2014
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 184 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 seconds | 7.9 seconds | |
|
Audi Q3 is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Qashqai engine produces 54 HP less power than Audi Q3, whereas torque is 60 NM less than Audi Q3. Due to the lower power, Nissan Qashqai reaches 100 km/h speed 3.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.6 | 5.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.8 l/100km | 7.2 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Qashqai is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Qashqai consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q3, which means that by driving the Nissan Qashqai over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Qashqai consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q3. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 64 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1190 km in combined cycle | 1250 km in combined cycle | |
| 1300 km on highway | 1450 km on highway | ||
| 800 km with real consumption | 880 km with real consumption | ||
| Audi Q3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 180 mm (7.1 inches) | 173 mm (6.8 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.39 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.59 m | 1.61 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Nissan Qashqai and Audi Q3 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 460 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1585 litres | 1365 litres | |
| Nissan Qashqai has 30 litres less trunk space than the Audi Q3. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Qashqai (by 220 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Qashqai is 1.1 metres less than that of the Audi Q3, which means Nissan Qashqai can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`005 | 2`225 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | high | |
| Audi Q3 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Qashqai has serious deffects in 65 percent more cases than Audi Q3, so Audi Q3 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 10 800 | 17 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Qashqai has
|
Audi Q3 has
| |