Nissan Qashqai 2013 vs Kia Sportage 2016
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 190 NM | 265 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
|
Kia Sportage is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Qashqai engine produces 62 HP less power than Kia Sportage, whereas torque is 75 NM less than Kia Sportage. Due to the lower power, Nissan Qashqai reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 7.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.6 l/100km | 9.0 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Qashqai is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Qashqai consumes 2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Sportage, which means that by driving the Nissan Qashqai over 15,000 km in a year you can save 300 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Qashqai consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Sportage. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 980 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
| 1120 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| 720 km with real consumption | 680 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan Qashqai gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 250'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Nissan Juke, Nissan Pulsar | Installed on at least 9 other car models, including Kia Ceed, Hyundai Sonata, Hyundai Tucson, Hyundai Elantra | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Kia Sportage might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.59 m | 1.64 m | |
|
Nissan Qashqai is smaller. Nissan Qashqai is 10 cm shorter than the Kia Sportage, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Qashqai is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 491 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1585 litres | no data | |
|
Kia Sportage has more luggage space. Nissan Qashqai has 61 litres less trunk space than the Kia Sportage. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Qashqai is 0.1 metres more than that of the Kia Sportage. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`860 | 2`210 | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Nissan Qashqai scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Kia Sportage has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Qashqai has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Kia Sportage, so Kia Sportage quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 10 000 | 13 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Qashqai has
|
Kia Sportage has
| |