Nissan Qashqai 2013 vs Hyundai ix35 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 135 HP | |
| Torque: | 190 NM | 165 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 seconds | 11.1 seconds | |
|
Nissan Qashqai is more dynamic to drive. Nissan Qashqai engine produces 20 HP less power than Hyundai ix35, but torque is 25 NM more than Hyundai ix35. Despite less power, Nissan Qashqai reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 6.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.6 l/100km | 8.4 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Qashqai is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Qashqai consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai ix35, which means that by driving the Nissan Qashqai over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Qashqai consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai ix35. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 980 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| 1120 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
| 720 km with real consumption | 650 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan Qashqai gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Hyundai ix35 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 16 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Nissan Juke, Nissan Pulsar | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Kia Sportage, Kia Ceed, Hyundai Tucson, Hyundai Elantra, Hyundai i30 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Hyundai ix35 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hyundai ix35 2013 1.6 engine: The engine is generally a reliable design and not particularly sensitive to fuel quality. However, it is prone to several common issues. One of the most widespread problems is the rapid buildup of carbon ... More about Hyundai ix35 2013 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.41 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.59 m | 1.67 m | |
|
Nissan Qashqai is smaller. Nissan Qashqai is 3 cm shorter than the Hyundai ix35, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Qashqai is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 591 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1585 litres | 1436 litres | |
| Nissan Qashqai has 161 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai ix35. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Qashqai (by 149 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Qashqai is 0.1 metres more than that of the Hyundai ix35. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`860 | 1`830 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Nissan Qashqai has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Hyundai ix35 has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Nissan Qashqai, so Nissan Qashqai quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 10 000 | 9600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Qashqai has
|
Hyundai ix35 has
| |