Nissan Qashqai 2013 vs Kia Sportage 2014
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.2 - 2.0 | 1.6 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 - 163 HP | 115 - 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 165 - 320 NM | 164 - 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 - 12.9 seconds | 9.8 - 12.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 - 7.7 | 5.2 - 8.5 | |
|
Nissan Qashqai petrol engines consumes on average 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Kia Sportage. On average, Nissan Qashqai equipped with diesel engines consume 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Sportage. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.44 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.59 m | 1.63 m | |
|
Nissan Qashqai is smaller. Nissan Qashqai is 6 cm shorter than the Kia Sportage, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Qashqai is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 564 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1585 litres | no data | |
|
Kia Sportage has more luggage space. Nissan Qashqai has 134 litres less trunk space than the Kia Sportage. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Qashqai is 0.1 metres less than that of the Kia Sportage. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`924 | ~ 1`952 | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Nissan Qashqai scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Average price (€): | 10 000 | 11 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Qashqai has
|
Kia Sportage has
| |