Nissan Qashqai 2013 vs Hyundai ix35 2013
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 1.2 - 2.0 | 1.6 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 110 - 163 HP | 116 - 184 HP | |
Torque: | 165 - 320 NM | 165 - 383 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 - 12.9 seconds | 9.4 - 12.4 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 - 7.7 | 5.2 - 8.8 | |
Nissan Qashqai petrol engines consumes on average 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Hyundai ix35. On average, Nissan Qashqai equipped with diesel engines consume 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai ix35. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.38 m | 4.41 m | |
Width: | 1.81 m | 1.82 m | |
Height: | 1.59 m | 1.67 m | |
Nissan Qashqai is smaller. Nissan Qashqai is 3 cm shorter than the Hyundai ix35, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Qashqai is 8 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 591 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1585 litres | 1436 litres | |
Nissan Qashqai has 161 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai ix35. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Qashqai (by 149 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11.2 meters | |
The turning circle of the Nissan Qashqai is 0.5 metres less than that of the Hyundai ix35, which means Nissan Qashqai can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`924 | ~ 2`041 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | below average | below average | |
Average price (€): | 10 000 | 9600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Qashqai has
|
Hyundai ix35 has
| |