Nissan Qashqai 2013 vs Ford Kuga 2013
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.2 - 2.0 | 1.6 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 - 163 HP | 140 - 182 HP | |
| Torque: | 165 - 320 NM | 230 - 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 - 12.9 seconds | 9.7 - 11.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 - 7.7 | 5.9 - 7.7 | |
|
Nissan Qashqai petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than Ford Kuga. On average, Nissan Qashqai equipped with diesel engines consume 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Kuga. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.59 m | 1.69 m | |
|
Nissan Qashqai is smaller. Nissan Qashqai is 15 cm shorter than the Ford Kuga, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Qashqai is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 456 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1585 litres | 1568 litres | |
| Nissan Qashqai has 26 litres less trunk space than the Ford Kuga. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Qashqai (by 17 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Qashqai is 0.3 metres less than that of the Ford Kuga. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`924 | ~ 2`213 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 10 000 | 11 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Qashqai has
|
Ford Kuga has
| |