Nissan Patrol 2004 vs Ford Ranger 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 160 HP | 143 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 330 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16.3 seconds | 12 seconds | |
| Nissan Patrol engine produces 17 HP more power than Ford Ranger, whereas torque is 50 NM more than Ford Ranger. Despite the higher power, Nissan Patrol reaches 100 km/h speed 4.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.8 | 8.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.5 l/100km | 9.5 l/100km | |
|
The Ford Ranger is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Patrol consumes 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Ranger, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Patrol could require 285 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Patrol consumes 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Ranger. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 95 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 870 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
| 1050 km on highway | 800 km on highway | ||
| 820 km with real consumption | 660 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan Patrol gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 220 mm (8.7 inches) | 205 mm (8.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Nissan Patrol can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.15 m | 5.08 m | |
| Width: | 1.94 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.86 m | 1.76 m | |
|
Nissan Patrol is larger. Nissan Patrol is 8 cm longer than the Ford Ranger, 14 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Patrol is 11 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 810 litres | 1500 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2226 litres | no data | |
|
Ford Ranger has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Nissan Patrol uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.2 meters | 13 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Patrol is 0.8 metres less than that of the Ford Ranger, which means Nissan Patrol can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 3`110 kg | 3`020 kg | |
| Net weight: | 2`410 kg | 1`955 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 700 kg | 1`065 kg | |
| Nissan Patrol load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 52 procentiem less than Ford Ranger. Therefore, Ford Ranger is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 16 200 | 6600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Patrol has
|
Ford Ranger has
| |