Nissan Navara 2005 vs Ford Ranger 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 174 HP | 143 HP | |
| Torque: | 403 NM | 330 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | 14.7 seconds | |
|
Nissan Navara is more dynamic to drive. Nissan Navara engine produces 31 HP more power than Ford Ranger, whereas torque is 73 NM more than Ford Ranger. Thanks to more power Nissan Navara reaches 100 km/h speed 3.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.2 | 10.4 | |
|
The Nissan Navara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Navara consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Ranger, which means that by driving the Nissan Navara over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 860 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
| 1020 km on highway | 770 km on highway | ||
| Nissan Navara gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.22 m | 5.08 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.76 m | |
|
Nissan Navara is larger. Nissan Navara is 14 cm longer than the Ford Ranger, 6 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Navara is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 1500 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 13.3 meters | 12.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Navara is 0.7 metres more than that of the Ford Ranger, which means Nissan Navara can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`000 | no data | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6800 | 7600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Navara has
|
Ford Ranger has
| |