Nissan Navara 1998 vs Ford Ranger 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 133 HP | 143 HP | |
| Torque: | 304 NM | 330 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 12 seconds | |
| Nissan Navara engine produces 10 HP less power than Ford Ranger, whereas torque is 26 NM less than Ford Ranger. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 8.9 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 63 litres | |
| 720 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.22 m | 5.08 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.77 m | 1.76 m | |
|
Nissan Navara is larger. Nissan Navara is 15 cm longer than the Ford Ranger, 5 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Navara is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 1500 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 13.4 meters | 13 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Navara is 0.4 metres more than that of the Ford Ranger, which means Nissan Navara can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 3`020 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 10 400 | 7200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Ford Ranger has
| |