Nissan Navara 1998 vs Ford Ranger 2006
Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 148 HP | 156 HP | |
Torque: | 314 NM | 380 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 13.6 seconds | |
Nissan Navara engine produces 8 HP less power than Ford Ranger, whereas torque is 66 NM less than Ford Ranger. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 10.2 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 70 litres | |
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 5.22 m | 5.08 m | |
Width: | 1.85 m | 1.81 m | |
Height: | 1.77 m | 1.75 m | |
Nissan Navara is larger. Nissan Navara is 15 cm longer than the Ford Ranger, 5 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Navara is 3 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 1500 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 13.4 meters | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 10 400 | 7200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
|
Ford Ranger has
| |