Nissan Navara 1998 vs Ford Ranger 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nissan Navara is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Ford Ranger has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Nissan Navara is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Ford Ranger can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Ford Ranger also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.4 - 3.0 | 2.3 - 4.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 133 - 148 HP | 143 - 207 HP | |
| Torque: | 208 - 314 NM | 209 - 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 12 - 14.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 8.9 - 10.4 | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.22 m | 5.00 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.77 m | 1.73 m | |
| Nissan Navara is 22 cm longer than the Ford Ranger, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Navara is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 1500 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 13.4 meters | 13 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Navara is 0.4 metres more than that of the Ford Ranger, which means Nissan Navara can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 3`020 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 10 400 | 7200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Navara has
|
Ford Ranger has
| |