Nissan Navara 2005 vs Ford Ranger 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.5 - 4.0 | 2.3 - 4.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 174 - 265 HP | 143 - 207 HP | |
| Torque: | 385 - 403 NM | 209 - 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 - 11.5 seconds | 12 - 14.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 - 13.8 | 8.9 - 10.4 | |
|
On average, Nissan Navara equipped with diesel engines consume 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Ranger. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.22 m | 5.00 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.73 m | |
| Nissan Navara is 22 cm longer than the Ford Ranger, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Navara is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 1500 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 13.3 meters | 13 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Navara is 0.3 metres more than that of the Ford Ranger. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 3`000 | ~ 3`020 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6000 | 7200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Navara has
|
| |