Nissan Murano 2002 vs Land Rover Discovery 2002
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.5 Petrol | 2.5 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Nissan Murano) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Land Rover Discovery) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Double-row timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 248 HP | 137 HP | |
| Torque: | 333 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 seconds | 15.3 seconds | |
|
Nissan Murano is more dynamic to drive. Nissan Murano engine produces 111 HP more power than Land Rover Discovery, whereas torque is 33 NM more than Land Rover Discovery. Thanks to more power Nissan Murano reaches 100 km/h speed 6.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.3 | 9.4 | |
|
The Land Rover Discovery is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Murano consumes 2.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Discovery, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Murano could require 435 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 82 litres | 93 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 660 km in combined cycle | 980 km in combined cycle | |
| 860 km on highway | 1130 km on highway | ||
| Land Rover Discovery gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - Full time 4WD | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 25 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Infiniti FX, Nissan Pathfinder | Used also on Land Rover Defender | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Murano might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.77 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.90 m | |
| Nissan Murano is 7 cm longer than the Land Rover Discovery, width is practically the same , while the height of Nissan Murano is 21 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 923 litres | 1290 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2005 litres | 1970 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Nissan Murano has 367 litres less trunk space than the Land Rover Discovery. This could mean that the Nissan Murano uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Murano (by 35 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`295 | 2`750 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 5200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Murano has
|
Land Rover Discovery has
| |