Nissan Murano 2002 vs Toyota RAV4 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Nissan Murano is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Toyota RAV4 has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
Engines: | 3.5 (petrol) | 1.8 - 2.4 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 234 - 248 HP | 116 - 161 HP | |
Torque: | 318 - 333 NM | 161 - 250 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.9 - 8.9 seconds | 10.6 - 12.2 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.6 - 12.3 | 7.1 - 9.8 | |
Nissan Murano petrol engines consumes on average 2.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than Toyota RAV4. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.77 m | 4.24 m | |
Width: | 1.88 m | 1.75 m | |
Height: | 1.69 m | 1.70 m | |
Nissan Murano is larger, but slightly lower. Nissan Murano is 53 cm longer than the Toyota RAV4, 13 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 923 litres | 678 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2005 litres | 1909 litres | |
Nissan Murano has more luggage capacity. Nissan Murano has 245 litres more trunk space than the Toyota RAV4. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Murano (by 96 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 10.7 meters | |
The turning circle of the Nissan Murano is 1.3 metres more than that of the Toyota RAV4, which means Nissan Murano can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`293 | ~ 1`836 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | high | |
Average price (€): | 2600 | 3200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Murano has
|
Toyota RAV4 has
| |