Nissan Murano 2008 vs Nissan Qashqai 2008
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nissan Murano is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Nissan Qashqai has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 2.5 - 3.5 | 1.5 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 - 256 HP | 103 - 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 334 - 450 NM | 156 - 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8 - 10.5 seconds | 10 - 12.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 - 10.9 | 5.5 - 8.4 | |
|
Nissan Murano petrol engines consumes on average 2.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than Nissan Qashqai. On average, Nissan Murano equipped with diesel engines consume 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.83 m | 4.34 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Nissan Murano is larger. Nissan Murano is 49 cm longer than the Nissan Qashqai, 10 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Murano is 12 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 402 litres | 410 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1520 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Nissan Murano has 8 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Qashqai. This could mean that the Nissan Murano uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`326 | ~ 2`170 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 4200 | 5200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Murano has
|
Nissan Qashqai has
| |