Nissan Micra 2005 vs Suzuki Swift 2004

 
Nissan Micra
2005 - 2008
Suzuki Swift
2004 - 2010
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.5 Diesel1.2 Diesel

Performance

Power: 65 HP70 HP
Torque: 160 NM170 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 15.9 seconds14.2 seconds
Suzuki Swift is a more dynamic driving.
Nissan Micra engine produces 5 HP less power than Suzuki Swift, whereas torque is 10 NM less than Suzuki Swift. Due to the lower power, Nissan Micra reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.64.6
Fuel tank capacity: 46 litres45 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1000 km in combined cycle970 km in combined cycle
1150 km on highway1120 km on highway
950 km with real consumption860 km with real consumption

Dimensions

Length: 3.72 m3.70 m
Width: 1.66 m1.69 m
Height: 1.54 m1.50 m
Nissan Micra is 3 cm longer than the Suzuki Swift, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Micra is 4 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 251 litres213 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
584 litres562 litres
Nissan Micra has more luggage capacity.
Nissan Micra has 38 litres more trunk space than the Suzuki Swift. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Micra (by 22 litres).
Turning diameter: 9.8 meters9.4 meters
The turning circle of the Nissan Micra is 0.4 metres more than that of the Suzuki Swift, which means Nissan Micra can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`5101`525
Safety: no data
Quality:
below average

below average
Nissan Micra has slightly fewer faults.
Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Suzuki Swift, so Nissan Micra quality could be a bit better.
Average price (€): 20002800
Pros and Cons: Nissan Micra has
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Suzuki Swift has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv