Nissan Micra 2005 vs Suzuki Swift 2004
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 65 HP | 70 HP | |
Torque: | 160 NM | 170 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.9 seconds | 14.2 seconds | |
Suzuki Swift is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Micra engine produces 5 HP less power than Suzuki Swift, whereas torque is 10 NM less than Suzuki Swift. Due to the lower power, Nissan Micra reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.6 | 4.6 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 46 litres | 45 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 970 km in combined cycle | |
1150 km on highway | 1120 km on highway | ||
950 km with real consumption | 860 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.72 m | 3.70 m | |
Width: | 1.66 m | 1.69 m | |
Height: | 1.54 m | 1.50 m | |
Nissan Micra is 3 cm longer than the Suzuki Swift, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Micra is 4 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 251 litres | 213 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
584 litres | 562 litres | |
Nissan Micra has more luggage capacity. Nissan Micra has 38 litres more trunk space than the Suzuki Swift. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Micra (by 22 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 9.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Nissan Micra is 0.4 metres more than that of the Suzuki Swift, which means Nissan Micra can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`510 | 1`525 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | below average | below average | |
Nissan Micra has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Suzuki Swift, so Nissan Micra quality could be a bit better. | |||
Average price (€): | 2000 | 2800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Micra has
|
Suzuki Swift has
| |