Nissan Micra 2005 vs Toyota Aygo 2005
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 88 HP | 68 HP | |
| Torque: | 128 NM | 93 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15 seconds | 14.9 seconds | |
| Nissan Micra engine produces 20 HP more power than Toyota Aygo, whereas torque is 35 NM more than Toyota Aygo. Despite the higher power, Nissan Micra reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 | 3.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.8 l/100km | 5.6 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Aygo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Micra consumes 3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Aygo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Micra could require 450 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Micra consumes 2.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Aygo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 46 litres | 35 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 920 km in combined cycle | |
| 790 km on highway | 1020 km on highway | ||
| 580 km with real consumption | 620 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota Aygo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 280'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 21 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Nissan Note, Nissan Cube | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota Yaris, Citroen C1, Peugeot 107, Peugeot 108 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Aygo might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Toyota Aygo 2005 1.0 engine: Engine often vibrates and has difficulty starting in cold weather. Timing chain lifetime is not very long. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.72 m | 3.41 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.62 m | |
| Height: | 1.54 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Nissan Micra is larger. Nissan Micra is 31 cm longer than the Toyota Aygo, 4 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Micra is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 251 litres | 139 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
584 litres | 751 litres | |
| Nissan Micra has 112 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Aygo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota Aygo (by 167 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 9.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Micra is 0.4 metres more than that of the Toyota Aygo, which means Nissan Micra can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`475 | 1`160 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Toyota Aygo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Micra has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Toyota Aygo, so Toyota Aygo quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Micra has
|
Toyota Aygo has
| |