Nissan Micra 2005 vs Ford Focus 2004

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Nissan Micra
2005 - 2008
Ford Focus
2004 - 2008
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.2 - 1.61.4 - 2.5

Performance

Power: 65 - 110 HP80 - 225 HP
Torque: 110 - 185 NM124 - 320 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.8 - 17.9 seconds6.8 - 14.1 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.5 - 6.84.7 - 9.3
Nissan Micra petrol engines consumes on average 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Ford Focus. On average, Nissan Micra equipped with diesel engines consume 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Focus.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 3.72 m4.34 m
Width: 1.66 m1.84 m
Height: 1.54 m1.45 m
Nissan Micra is smaller, but higher.
Nissan Micra is 62 cm shorter than the Ford Focus, 18 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Micra is 9 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 251 litres385 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
982 litres1247 litres
Ford Focus has more luggage space.
Nissan Micra has 134 litres less trunk space than the Ford Focus. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Focus (by 265 litres).
Turning diameter: 9.8 meters10.4 meters
The turning circle of the Nissan Micra is 0.6 metres less than that of the Ford Focus, which means Nissan Micra can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`486~ 1`775
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

average
Average price (€): 20001400
Pros and Cons: Nissan Micra has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
Ford Focus has
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv