Nissan Micra 2005 vs Ford Focus 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.2 - 1.6 | 1.4 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 65 - 110 HP | 80 - 225 HP | |
| Torque: | 110 - 185 NM | 124 - 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.8 - 17.9 seconds | 6.8 - 14.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 - 6.8 | 4.7 - 9.3 | |
|
Nissan Micra petrol engines consumes on average 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Ford Focus. On average, Nissan Micra equipped with diesel engines consume 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Focus. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.72 m | 4.34 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.54 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Nissan Micra is smaller, but higher. Nissan Micra is 62 cm shorter than the Ford Focus, 18 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Micra is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 251 litres | 385 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
982 litres | 1247 litres | |
|
Ford Focus has more luggage space. Nissan Micra has 134 litres less trunk space than the Ford Focus. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Focus (by 265 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Micra is 0.6 metres less than that of the Ford Focus, which means Nissan Micra can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`486 | ~ 1`775 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Micra has
|
Ford Focus has
| |