Nissan Micra 2005 vs Suzuki Alto 2009
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.2 - 1.6 (petrol, diesel) | 1.0 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 65 - 110 HP | 68 HP | |
| Torque: | 110 - 185 NM | 90 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.8 - 17.9 seconds | 14 - 17 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 - 6.8 | 4.4 - 5.2 | |
|
Nissan Micra petrol engines consumes on average 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Suzuki Alto. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.72 m | 3.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.60 m | |
| Height: | 1.54 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Nissan Micra is larger. Nissan Micra is 22 cm longer than the Suzuki Alto, 6 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Micra is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 251 litres | 129 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
982 litres | 774 litres | |
|
Nissan Micra has more luggage capacity. Nissan Micra has 122 litres more trunk space than the Suzuki Alto. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Micra (by 208 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Micra is 0.8 metres more than that of the Suzuki Alto, which means Nissan Micra can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`486 | ~ 1`250 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 2800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Micra has
|
Suzuki Alto has
| |