Nissan Micra 2005 vs Honda Jazz 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.2 - 1.6 (petrol, diesel) | 1.2 - 1.3 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 65 - 110 HP | 78 - 83 HP | |
| Torque: | 110 - 185 NM | 110 - 119 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.8 - 17.9 seconds | 12.9 - 14.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 - 6.8 | 5.5 - 5.8 | |
|
Nissan Micra petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than Honda Jazz. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.72 m | 3.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.54 m | 1.52 m | |
|
Nissan Micra is smaller, but slightly higher. Nissan Micra is 12 cm shorter than the Honda Jazz, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Micra is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 251 litres | 380 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
982 litres | 1323 litres | |
|
Honda Jazz has more luggage space. Nissan Micra has 129 litres less trunk space than the Honda Jazz. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda Jazz (by 341 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`486 | ~ 1`465 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | high | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Micra has
|
Honda Jazz has
| |