Nissan Micra 2008 vs Mazda 3 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.2 - 1.6 | 1.3 - 2.3 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 65 - 110 HP | 84 - 265 HP | |
| Torque: | 110 - 200 NM | 122 - 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.8 - 17.9 seconds | 6.1 - 14.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 - 6.8 | 4.7 - 9.7 | |
|
Nissan Micra petrol engines consumes on average 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mazda 3. On average, Nissan Micra equipped with diesel engines consume 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.72 m | 4.42 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.54 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Nissan Micra is smaller, but higher. Nissan Micra is 70 cm shorter than the Mazda 3, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Micra is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 251 litres | 300 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
982 litres | 1229 litres | |
|
Mazda 3 has more luggage space. Nissan Micra has 49 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 3. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 3 (by 247 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Micra is 1.1 metres less than that of the Mazda 3, which means Nissan Micra can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`480 | ~ 1`808 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Micra has
|
Mazda 3 has
| |