Nissan 200 SX 1997 vs Volvo V40 2016
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Coupe | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Nissan 200 SX is available with rear wheel drive, while Volvo V40 can be equipped with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 (petrol) | 1.5 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. Volvo V40 is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 200 HP | 120 - 245 HP | |
| Torque: | 265 NM | 220 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.5 - 8.3 seconds | 6.3 - 10.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.8 - 8.9 | 3.4 - 5.9 | |
|
Nissan 200 SX petrol engines consumes on average 3.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volvo V40. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.30 m | 1.44 m | |
| Nissan 200 SX is 15 cm longer than the Volvo V40, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan 200 SX is 14 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 307 litres | 335 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1500 litres | |
|
Volvo V40 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Nissan 200 SX has 28 litres less trunk space than the Volvo V40. This could mean that the Nissan 200 SX uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.6 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan 200 SX is 1.2 metres less than that of the Volvo V40, which means Nissan 200 SX can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`780 | ~ 1`978 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 12 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan 200 SX has
|
Volvo V40 has
| |