Nissan 200 SX 1997 vs SAAB 9-3 1998
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Nissan 200 SX is available with rear wheel drive, while SAAB 9-3 can be equipped with front wheel drive. | |||
Engines: | 2.0 (petrol) | 2.0 - 2.3 (petrol, diesel) | |
Both cars are available with petrol engines. SAAB 9-3 is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 200 HP | 115 - 225 HP | |
Torque: | 265 NM | 177 - 342 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.5 - 8.3 seconds | 6.8 - 13 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.8 - 8.9 | 6.2 - 10.8 | |
Nissan 200 SX petrol engines consumes on average 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than SAAB 9-3. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.52 m | 4.63 m | |
Width: | 1.73 m | 1.71 m | |
Height: | 1.30 m | 1.43 m | |
Nissan 200 SX is 11 cm shorter than the SAAB 9-3, 2 cm wider, while the height of Nissan 200 SX is 13 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 307 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 9.6 meters | 10.5 meters | |
The turning circle of the Nissan 200 SX is 0.9 metres less than that of the SAAB 9-3, which means Nissan 200 SX can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`780 | ~ 1`600 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | above average | |
Average price (€): | no data | 2400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Nissan 200 SX has
|
SAAB 9-3 has
| |