Nissan 200 SX 1997 vs Toyota Celica 1999
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nissan 200 SX is available with both manual and automatic gearboxes, whereas Toyota Celica is available only with manual gearbox. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Nissan 200 SX is available with rear wheel drive, while Toyota Celica can be equipped with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 | 1.8 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 200 HP | 143 - 192 HP | |
| Torque: | 265 NM | 172 - 180 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.5 - 8.3 seconds | 7.4 - 8.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.8 - 8.9 | 7.7 - 8.4 | |
|
Nissan 200 SX petrol engines consumes on average 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than Toyota Celica. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.34 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.30 m | 1.32 m | |
| Nissan 200 SX is 18 cm longer than the Toyota Celica, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan 200 SX is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 307 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.6 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan 200 SX is 0.8 metres less than that of the Toyota Celica, which means Nissan 200 SX can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`780 | ~ 1`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan 200 SX has
|
Toyota Celica has
| |