Nissan 200 SX 1997 vs Mercedes CLK 1997
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 | 2.0 - 4.3 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 200 HP | 136 - 279 HP | |
| Torque: | 265 NM | 190 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.5 - 8.3 seconds | 6.3 - 11.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.8 - 8.9 | 9.4 - 11.2 | |
|
Nissan 200 SX petrol engines consumes on average 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mercedes CLK. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.30 m | 1.37 m | |
| Nissan 200 SX is 5 cm shorter than the Mercedes CLK, 1 cm wider, while the height of Nissan 200 SX is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 307 litres | 420 litres | |
|
Mercedes CLK has more luggage space. Nissan 200 SX has 113 litres less trunk space than the Mercedes CLK. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.6 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan 200 SX is 1.1 metres less than that of the Mercedes CLK, which means Nissan 200 SX can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`780 | ~ 1`853 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan 200 SX has
|
Mercedes CLK has
| |