Nissan 200 SX 1997 vs Jaguar XKR 1998
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Nissan 200 SX is available with both manual and automatic gearboxes, whereas Jaguar XKR is available only with automatic gearbox. | |||
Engines: | 2.0 | 4.0 - 4.2 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 200 HP | 363 - 395 HP | |
Torque: | 265 NM | 505 - 540 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.5 - 8.3 seconds | 5.4 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.8 - 8.9 | 12.4 - 12.5 | |
Nissan 200 SX petrol engines consumes on average 3.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than Jaguar XKR. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.52 m | 4.76 m | |
Width: | 1.73 m | 1.83 m | |
Height: | 1.30 m | 1.30 m | |
Nissan 200 SX is smaller, but slightly higher. Nissan 200 SX is 24 cm shorter than the Jaguar XKR, 10 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 307 litres | 327 litres | |
Nissan 200 SX has 20 litres less trunk space than the Jaguar XKR. | |||
Turning diameter: | 9.6 meters | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`780 | ~ 2`057 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | no data | 9200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Nissan 200 SX has
|
Jaguar XKR has
| |