Nissan 200 SX 1997 vs Citroen Xsara 1998
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Nissan 200 SX is available with rear wheel drive, while Citroen Xsara can be equipped with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 (petrol) | 1.4 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 200 HP | 68 - 167 HP | |
| Torque: | 265 NM | 112 - 205 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.5 - 8.3 seconds | 8.7 - 17.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.8 - 8.9 | 5.2 - 9.4 | |
|
Nissan 200 SX petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than Citroen Xsara. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.17 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.30 m | 1.40 m | |
|
Nissan 200 SX is larger, but lower. Nissan 200 SX is 35 cm longer than the Citroen Xsara, 3 cm wider, while the height of Nissan 200 SX is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 307 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.6 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan 200 SX is 1.1 metres less than that of the Citroen Xsara, which means Nissan 200 SX can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`780 | ~ 1`100 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan 200 SX has
|
Citroen Xsara has
| |