Nissan 200 SX 1997 vs Chevrolet Camaro 1997
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nissan 200 SX is available with both manual and automatic gearboxes, whereas Chevrolet Camaro is available only with manual gearbox. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 | 3.8 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 200 HP | 203 HP | |
| Torque: | 265 NM | 305 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.5 - 8.3 seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.8 - 8.9 | 10.0 | |
|
Nissan 200 SX petrol engines consumes on average 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Chevrolet Camaro. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.92 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.30 m | 1.30 m | |
|
Nissan 200 SX is smaller. Nissan 200 SX is 40 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Camaro, 15 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 307 litres | 923 litres | |
|
Chevrolet Camaro has more luggage space. Nissan 200 SX has 616 litres less trunk space than the Chevrolet Camaro. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.6 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`780 | ~ 1`872 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 5600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan 200 SX has
|
Chevrolet Camaro has
| |