Nissan 200 SX 1997 vs Alfa Romeo GTV 1998
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Nissan 200 SX is available with both manual and automatic gearboxes, whereas Alfa Romeo GTV is available only with manual gearbox. | |||
Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Nissan 200 SX is available with rear wheel drive, while Alfa Romeo GTV can be equipped with front wheel drive. | |||
Engines: | 2.0 | 1.7 - 3.0 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 200 HP | 144 - 220 HP | |
Torque: | 265 NM | 169 - 271 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.5 - 8.3 seconds | 6.7 - 9.2 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.8 - 8.9 | 8.9 - 11.7 | |
Nissan 200 SX petrol engines consumes on average 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Alfa Romeo GTV. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.52 m | 4.28 m | |
Width: | 1.73 m | 1.78 m | |
Height: | 1.30 m | 1.32 m | |
Nissan 200 SX is 24 cm longer than the Alfa Romeo GTV, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan 200 SX is 2 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 307 litres | 155 litres | |
Nissan 200 SX has more luggage capacity. Nissan 200 SX has 152 litres more trunk space than the Alfa Romeo GTV. | |||
Turning diameter: | 9.6 meters | 12 meters | |
The turning circle of the Nissan 200 SX is 2.4 metres less than that of the Alfa Romeo GTV, which means Nissan 200 SX can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`780 | ~ 1`778 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | no data | 3400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Nissan 200 SX has
|
Alfa Romeo GTV has
| |