Nissan 200 SX 1994 vs Seat Cordoba 1996
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nissan 200 SX is available with both manual and automatic gearboxes, whereas Seat Cordoba is available only with manual gearbox. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Nissan 200 SX is available with rear wheel drive, while Seat Cordoba can be equipped with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 (petrol) | 1.6 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 200 HP | 75 - 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 265 NM | 125 - 235 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.5 - 8.3 seconds | 8.5 - 13.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.8 - 9.3 | 4.8 - 8.4 | |
|
Nissan 200 SX petrol engines consumes on average 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Seat Cordoba. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.14 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.30 m | 1.41 m | |
|
Nissan 200 SX is larger, but lower. Nissan 200 SX is 38 cm longer than the Seat Cordoba, 9 cm wider, while the height of Nissan 200 SX is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 307 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.6 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan 200 SX is 0.4 metres less than that of the Seat Cordoba, which means Nissan 200 SX can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`780 | ~ 1`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan 200 SX has
|
Seat Cordoba has
| |