Mitsubishi Xpander 2021 vs Ford Kuga 2019
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Mitsubishi Xpander is available only with front wheel drive, while Ford Kuga can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.5 (petrol) | 1.5 - 2.5 (petrol, diesel, hybrid) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 120 - 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 141 NM | 200 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 8.7 - 12 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 1.2 | |
| Ground clearance: | 220 mm (8.7 inches) | 160 mm (6.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mitsubishi Xpander can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.60 m | 4.61 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Xpander is smaller, but higher. Mitsubishi Xpander is 2 cm shorter than the Ford Kuga, 13 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Xpander is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 435 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1534 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 2`168 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 21 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Xpander has
|
Ford Kuga has
| |