Mitsubishi Lancer 2004 vs Volvo S40 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 98 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 150 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Volvo S40 is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Lancer engine produces 42 HP less power than Volvo S40, whereas torque is 70 NM less than Volvo S40. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Lancer reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 8.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.3 l/100km | 9.2 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Lancer is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Lancer consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S40, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Lancer over 15,000 km in a year you can save 255 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Lancer consumes 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S40. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 730 km in combined cycle | |
| 900 km on highway | 950 km on highway | ||
| 680 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Mitsubishi Space Star | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Volvo V70, Volvo S80, Volvo S60, Volvo V50, Volvo S70 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Volvo S40 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.47 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.45 m | |
| Mitsubishi Lancer is 1 cm longer than the Volvo S40, 8 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 404 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 883 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi Lancer has more luggage capacity. Mitsubishi Lancer has 26 litres more trunk space than the Volvo S40. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`750 | 1`940 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 2400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.7/10 | 8.5/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Lancer has
|
Volvo S40 has
| |