Mitsubishi Lancer 2004 vs Volvo S40 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Mitsubishi Lancer) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Volvo S40) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 98 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 150 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
|
Volvo S40 is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Lancer engine produces 38 HP less power than Volvo S40, whereas torque is 190 NM less than Volvo S40. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Lancer reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 5.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.3 l/100km | 6.1 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo S40 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Lancer consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S40, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Lancer could require 165 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Lancer consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S40. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 980 km in combined cycle | |
| 900 km on highway | 1220 km on highway | ||
| 680 km with real consumption | 900 km with real consumption | ||
| Volvo S40 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.47 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.45 m | |
| Mitsubishi Lancer is 1 cm longer than the Volvo S40, 8 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 404 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 883 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi Lancer has more luggage capacity. Mitsubishi Lancer has 26 litres more trunk space than the Volvo S40. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`750 | 1`940 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 2200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.7/10 | 8.6/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Lancer has
|
Volvo S40 has
| |