Mitsubishi L 200 2015 vs Toyota Hilux 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Diesel | 2.8 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 181 HP | 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 430 NM | 450 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Mitsubishi L 200 engine produces 4 HP more power than Toyota Hilux, but torque is 20 NM less than Toyota Hilux. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 80 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mitsubishi L 200 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Used also on Toyota Land Cruiser | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Hilux might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Toyota Hilux engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Toyota Hilux 2017 2.8 engine: The 1GD-FTV diesel engine was introduced by Toyota in 2015 to address the shortcomings of the earlier KD series, such as high noise levels, poor performance, low fuel efficiency, environmental concerns, and ... More about Toyota Hilux 2017 2.8 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.21 m | 5.33 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.82 m | |
|
Mitsubishi L 200 is smaller. Mitsubishi L 200 is 13 cm shorter than the Toyota Hilux, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi L 200 is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | no data | |
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`850 | 3`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 14 400 | 26 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi L 200 has
|
Toyota Hilux has
| |