Mitsubishi L 200 2015 vs Isuzu D-Max 2012

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Mitsubishi L 200
2015 - 2018
Isuzu D-Max
2012 - 2019
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 2.42.5

Performance

Power: 154 - 181 HP163 HP
Torque: 380 - 430 NM400 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.4 - 12.2 seconds12.7 - 13 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.1 - 7.57.3 - 8.4
On average, Mitsubishi L 200 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Isuzu D-Max.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Ground clearance: 200 - 205 mm (7.9 - 8.1 inches)235 mm (9.3 inches)
Because of the higher ground clearance, Isuzu D-Max can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds.

Dimensions

Length: 5.21 m5.30 m
Width: 1.81 m1.86 m
Height: 1.78 m1.78 m
Mitsubishi L 200 is smaller.
Mitsubishi L 200 is 9 cm shorter than the Isuzu D-Max, 5 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: no datano data
Turning diameter: 11.8 meters12.2 meters
The turning circle of the Mitsubishi L 200 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Isuzu D-Max.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 2`864~ 3`000
Safety: no data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 14 400no data
Pros and Cons: Mitsubishi L 200 has
  • lower fuel consumption for diesel engines
Isuzu D-Max has
  • higher ground clearance
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv