Mitsubishi Colt 1996 vs Ford Fiesta 2002
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 100 HP | |
| Torque: | 137 NM | 146 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Colt engine produces 10 HP less power than Ford Fiesta, whereas torque is 9 NM less than Ford Fiesta. Despite less power, Mitsubishi Colt reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.3 | 6.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.6 l/100km | 7.5 l/100km | |
|
The Ford Fiesta is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Colt consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Fiesta, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Colt could require 105 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Colt consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Fiesta. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| 860 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
| 650 km with real consumption | 600 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.88 m | 3.92 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.36 m | 1.46 m | |
| Mitsubishi Colt is 4 cm shorter than the Ford Fiesta, width is practically the same , while the height of Mitsubishi Colt is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 240 litres | 284 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
830 litres | 947 litres | |
|
Ford Fiesta has more luggage space. Mitsubishi Colt has 44 litres less trunk space than the Ford Fiesta. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Fiesta (by 117 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Colt is 0.2 metres more than that of the Ford Fiesta. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`480 | 1`540 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Mitsubishi Colt has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Fiesta has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Colt, so Mitsubishi Colt quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Colt has
|
Ford Fiesta has
| |