Mitsubishi Colt 1996 vs Ford Fiesta 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 108 NM | 110 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 13.1 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Colt and Ford Fiesta have the same engine power, but Mitsubishi Colt torque is 2 NM less than Ford Fiesta. Mitsubishi Colt reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 6.9 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 40 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 570 km in combined cycle | |
| 900 km on highway | 680 km on highway | ||
| 700 km with real consumption | 570 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi Colt gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 300'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 27 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Mitsubishi Lancer | Used also on Ford Fusion | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Colt might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.88 m | 3.83 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.63 m | |
| Height: | 1.36 m | 1.32 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt is larger. Mitsubishi Colt is 5 cm longer than the Ford Fiesta, 5 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Colt is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 240 litres | 250 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
830 litres | 930 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Mitsubishi Colt has 10 litres less trunk space than the Ford Fiesta. This could mean that the Mitsubishi Colt uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Fiesta (by 100 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 9.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Colt is 0.1 metres more than that of the Ford Fiesta. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`445 | 1`450 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Colt has
|
Ford Fiesta has
| |