Mitsubishi Colt 2004 vs Smart ForFour 2004
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 109 HP | 109 HP | |
| Torque: | 145 NM | 145 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.3 seconds | 9.8 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Colt and Smart ForFour have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Mitsubishi Colt reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 5.8 | |
|
The Smart ForFour is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Colt consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Smart ForFour, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Colt could require 75 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 47 litres | 47 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
| 900 km on highway | 970 km on highway | ||
| Smart ForFour gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 310'000 km | 310'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 21 years | 21 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.87 m | 3.75 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.55 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt is larger. Mitsubishi Colt is 12 cm longer than the Smart ForFour, 2 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Colt is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 268 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
760 litres | 910 litres | |
| Mitsubishi Colt has 232 litres more trunk space than the Smart ForFour. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Smart ForFour (by 150 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Colt is 0.3 metres more than that of the Smart ForFour. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`465 | 1`450 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | average | |
| Mitsubishi Colt has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Smart ForFour has serious deffects in 50 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Colt, so Mitsubishi Colt quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Colt has
|
Smart ForFour has
| |