Mitsubishi Colt 2004 vs Smart ForFour 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.1 Petrol | 1.1 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 64 HP | |
| Torque: | 100 NM | 92 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.4 seconds | 15.3 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Colt engine produces 11 HP more power than Smart ForFour, whereas torque is 8 NM more than Smart ForFour. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Colt reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | 5.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.2 l/100km | 6.0 l/100km | |
|
By specification Mitsubishi Colt consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Smart ForFour, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Colt could require 15 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Colt consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Smart ForFour. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 47 litres | 47 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 870 km in combined cycle | |
| 1020 km on highway | 1040 km on highway | ||
| 750 km with real consumption | 780 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.87 m | 3.75 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.55 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt is larger. Mitsubishi Colt is 12 cm longer than the Smart ForFour, 2 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Colt is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 268 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
760 litres | 910 litres | |
| Mitsubishi Colt has 232 litres more trunk space than the Smart ForFour. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Smart ForFour (by 150 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Colt is 0.3 metres more than that of the Smart ForFour. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`450 | 1`450 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Mitsubishi Colt has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Smart ForFour, so Mitsubishi Colt quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Colt has
|
| |