Mitsubishi Colt 2007 vs Honda Jazz 2004

Mitsubishi Colt
2007 - 2008
Honda Jazz
2004 - 2007
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.5 Petrol1.3 Petrol


Power: 109 HP83 HP
Torque: 145 NM119 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10 seconds12.9 seconds
Mitsubishi Colt is more dynamic to drive.
Mitsubishi Colt engine produces 26 HP more power than Honda Jazz, whereas torque is 26 NM more than Honda Jazz. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Colt reaches 100 km/h speed 2.9 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.25.7
Real fuel consumption: 6.7 l/100km6.4 l/100km
The Honda Jazz is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Mitsubishi Colt consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda Jazz, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Colt could require 75 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Colt consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda Jazz.
Fuel tank capacity: 47 litres42 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 750 km in combined cycle730 km in combined cycle
920 km on highway850 km on highway
700 km with real consumption650 km with real consumption


Length: 3.87 m3.84 m
Width: 1.70 m1.68 m
Height: 1.55 m1.52 m
Both cars are similar in size. Mitsubishi Colt is 3 cm longer than the Honda Jazz, 2 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Colt is 3 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 220 litres380 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
854 litres1323 litres
Honda Jazz has more luggage space.
Despite its longer length, Mitsubishi Colt has 160 litres less trunk space than the Honda Jazz. This could mean that the Mitsubishi Colt uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda Jazz (by 469 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.8 meters9.8 meters
The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Colt is 1 metres more than that of the Honda Jazz, which means Mitsubishi Colt can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): no data1`470
Safety: no data

above average
Mitsubishi Colt has slightly fewer faults.
Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Honda Jazz, so Mitsubishi Colt quality could be a bit better.
Average price (€): no data1800
Pros and Cons: Mitsubishi Colt has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
Honda Jazz has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: