Mitsubishi Colt 1996 vs Ford Fiesta 2002
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.3 - 1.6 (petrol) | 1.2 - 1.6 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 - 103 HP | 68 - 100 HP | |
| Torque: | 108 - 141 NM | 106 - 204 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 - 15.8 seconds | 10.6 - 15.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 - 8.4 | 4.3 - 7.5 | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt petrol engines consumes on average 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Ford Fiesta. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.88 m | 3.92 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.36 m | 1.46 m | |
| Mitsubishi Colt is 4 cm shorter than the Ford Fiesta, width is practically the same , while the height of Mitsubishi Colt is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 240 litres | 284 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
830 litres | 947 litres | |
|
Ford Fiesta has more luggage space. Mitsubishi Colt has 44 litres less trunk space than the Ford Fiesta. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Fiesta (by 117 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Colt is 0.2 metres more than that of the Ford Fiesta. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`471 | ~ 1`540 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Colt has
|
Ford Fiesta has
| |