Mitsubishi Colt 2005 vs Citroen C4 2008

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Mitsubishi Colt
2005 - 2009
Citroen C4
2008 - 2010
Body: HatchbackCoupe
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.1 - 1.51.4 - 2.0

Performance

Power: 68 - 150 HP90 - 150 HP
Torque: 100 - 210 NM133 - 320 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8 - 14.4 seconds9.2 - 14.2 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.8 - 6.84.5 - 7.6
Mitsubishi Colt petrol engines consumes on average 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than Citroen C4. On average, a Mitsubishi Colt with diesel engines consumes about the same amount of fuel per 100 km as a Citroen C4.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 3.81 m4.27 m
Width: 1.70 m1.77 m
Height: 1.52 m1.46 m
Mitsubishi Colt is smaller, but higher.
Mitsubishi Colt is 46 cm shorter than the Citroen C4, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Colt is 6 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 220 litres350 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
760 litres1083 litres
Citroen C4 has more luggage space.
Mitsubishi Colt has 130 litres less trunk space than the Citroen C4. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Citroen C4 (by 323 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.8 meters11.3 meters
The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Colt is 0.5 metres less than that of the Citroen C4, which means Mitsubishi Colt can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`482~ 1`766
Safety: no data
Quality:
above average

low
Average price (€): 14002200
Pros and Cons: Mitsubishi Colt has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Citroen C4 has
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv