Mitsubishi Colt 2005 vs Citroen C4 2008
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Body: | Hatchback | Coupe | |
---|---|---|---|
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
Engines: | 1.1 - 1.5 | 1.4 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 68 - 150 HP | 90 - 150 HP | |
Torque: | 100 - 210 NM | 133 - 320 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8 - 14.4 seconds | 9.2 - 14.2 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.8 - 6.8 | 4.5 - 7.6 | |
Mitsubishi Colt petrol engines consumes on average 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than Citroen C4. On average, a Mitsubishi Colt with diesel engines consumes about the same amount of fuel per 100 km as a Citroen C4. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.81 m | 4.27 m | |
Width: | 1.70 m | 1.77 m | |
Height: | 1.52 m | 1.46 m | |
Mitsubishi Colt is smaller, but higher. Mitsubishi Colt is 46 cm shorter than the Citroen C4, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Colt is 6 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 220 litres | 350 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
760 litres | 1083 litres | |
Citroen C4 has more luggage space. Mitsubishi Colt has 130 litres less trunk space than the Citroen C4. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Citroen C4 (by 323 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.3 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Colt is 0.5 metres less than that of the Citroen C4, which means Mitsubishi Colt can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`482 | ~ 1`766 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | above average | low | |
Average price (€): | 1400 | 2200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Colt has
|
Citroen C4 has
| |