Mitsubishi ASX 2016 vs Nissan X-Trail 2014
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 114 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
Nissan X-Trail is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi ASX engine produces 16 HP less power than Nissan X-Trail, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Nissan X-Trail. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi ASX reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 | 5.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.1 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi ASX is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi ASX consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi ASX over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi ASX consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1200 km in combined cycle | 1130 km in combined cycle | |
| 1270 km on highway | 1250 km on highway | ||
| 980 km with real consumption | 860 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi ASX gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
| Ground clearance: | 180 mm (7.1 inches) | 210 mm (8.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Nissan X-Trail can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Mitsubishi ASX is smaller. Mitsubishi ASX is 29 cm shorter than the Nissan X-Trail, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi ASX is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 419 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1219 litres | 1877 litres | |
|
Nissan X-Trail has more luggage space. Mitsubishi ASX has 131 litres less trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail (by 658 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi ASX is 0.6 metres less than that of the Nissan X-Trail, which means Mitsubishi ASX can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`980 | 2`320 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | below average | |
| Mitsubishi ASX has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan X-Trail has serious deffects in 80 percent more cases than Mitsubishi ASX, so Mitsubishi ASX quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 13 200 | 13 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi ASX has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |