Mitsubishi ASX 2010 vs Toyota RAV4 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi ASX is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi ASX engine produces 14 HP more power than Toyota RAV4, but torque is 10 NM less than Toyota RAV4. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi ASX reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 | 6.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.8 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi ASX is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi ASX consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi ASX over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi ASX consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1100 km in combined cycle | 900 km in combined cycle | |
| 1280 km on highway | 1070 km on highway | ||
| 920 km with real consumption | 780 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi ASX gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Corolla Verso, Toyota Verso | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota RAV4 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Toyota RAV4 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.40 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Mitsubishi ASX is smaller. Mitsubishi ASX is 11 cm shorter than the Toyota RAV4, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi ASX is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 419 litres | 586 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1219 litres | 1470 litres | |
|
Toyota RAV4 has more luggage space. Mitsubishi ASX has 167 litres less trunk space than the Toyota RAV4. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota RAV4 (by 251 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi ASX is 0.4 metres more than that of the Toyota RAV4, which means Mitsubishi ASX can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`190 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Mitsubishi ASX has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Toyota RAV4 has serious deffects in 75 percent more cases than Mitsubishi ASX, so Mitsubishi ASX quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 6600 | 5200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi ASX has
|
Toyota RAV4 has
| |