Mitsubishi ASX 2016 vs Peugeot 3008 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 117 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 154 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 seconds | 12.6 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi ASX is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi ASX engine produces 2 HP more power than Peugeot 3008, but torque is 116 NM less than Peugeot 3008. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi ASX reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 | 4.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.1 l/100km | 5.8 l/100km | |
|
The Peugeot 3008 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi ASX consumes 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 3008, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi ASX could require 285 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi ASX consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 3008. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1030 km in combined cycle | 1420 km in combined cycle | |
| 1260 km on highway | 1500 km on highway | ||
| 880 km with real consumption | 1030 km with real consumption | ||
| Peugeot 3008 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 13 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Citroen C3, Peugeot 207, Citroen C5, Citroen C4 Picasso | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Peugeot 3008 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.64 m | |
|
Mitsubishi ASX is smaller. Mitsubishi ASX is 7 cm shorter than the Peugeot 3008, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi ASX is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 384 litres | 432 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1219 litres | 1241 litres | |
|
Peugeot 3008 has more luggage space. Mitsubishi ASX has 48 litres less trunk space than the Peugeot 3008. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 3008 (by 22 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi ASX is 0.4 metres less than that of the Peugeot 3008, which means Mitsubishi ASX can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`870 | 2`020 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 12 000 | 8400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi ASX has
|
Peugeot 3008 has
| |