Mitsubishi ASX 2016 vs Nissan Qashqai 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 117 HP | 141 HP | |
| Torque: | 154 NM | 196 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 seconds | 10.1 seconds | |
|
Nissan Qashqai is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi ASX engine produces 24 HP less power than Nissan Qashqai, whereas torque is 42 NM less than Nissan Qashqai. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi ASX reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 | 6.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.1 l/100km | 10.0 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi ASX is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi ASX consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi ASX over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi ASX consumes 2.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1030 km in combined cycle | 940 km in combined cycle | |
| 1260 km on highway | 1180 km on highway | ||
| 880 km with real consumption | 650 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi ASX gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 16 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Serena | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Qashqai might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Mitsubishi ASX 2016 1.6 engine: The Mitsubishi 4A92 is a 1.6-liter inline four-cylinder engine with a timing chain, known primarily for its low fuel consumption and relatively simple construction. It is widely used in models such as the Lancer and ASX. While the engine is fairly economical and inexpensive to maintain, it also has ... More about Mitsubishi ASX 2016 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.59 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mitsubishi ASX is 8 cm shorter than the Nissan Qashqai, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi ASX is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 384 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1219 litres | no data | |
|
Nissan Qashqai has more luggage space. Mitsubishi ASX has 46 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Qashqai. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi ASX is 0.1 metres less than that of the Nissan Qashqai. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`870 kg | 1`890 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | average | |
| Mitsubishi ASX has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Qashqai has serious deffects in 55 percent more cases than Mitsubishi ASX, so Mitsubishi ASX quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 10 200 | 7600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi ASX has
|
Nissan Qashqai has
| |