Mitsubishi ASX 2012 vs Nissan Qashqai 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 141 HP | |
| Torque: | 177 NM | 196 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.1 seconds | 10.1 seconds | |
|
Nissan Qashqai is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi ASX engine produces 1 HP less power than Nissan Qashqai, whereas torque is 19 NM less than Nissan Qashqai. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi ASX reaches 100 km/h speed 3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.6 | 6.9 | |
|
The Nissan Qashqai is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi ASX consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi ASX could require 105 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 820 km in combined cycle | 940 km in combined cycle | |
| 980 km on highway | 1180 km on highway | ||
| Nissan Qashqai gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Mitsubishi Lancer | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Serena | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Qashqai might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.59 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mitsubishi ASX is 8 cm shorter than the Nissan Qashqai, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi ASX is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 384 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1219 litres | no data | |
|
Nissan Qashqai has more luggage space. Mitsubishi ASX has 46 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Qashqai. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi ASX is 0.1 metres less than that of the Nissan Qashqai. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`970 | 1`890 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | average | |
| Mitsubishi ASX has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Qashqai has serious deffects in 55 percent more cases than Mitsubishi ASX, so Mitsubishi ASX quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 11 000 | 10 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi ASX has
|
Nissan Qashqai has
| |