Mitsubishi ASX 2010 vs Toyota RAV4 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Mitsubishi ASX is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Toyota RAV4 can be equipped only with four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Mitsubishi ASX also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.0 | 2.0 - 2.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 117 - 150 HP | 136 - 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 154 - 300 NM | 194 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 - 13.1 seconds | 9.3 - 12 seconds | |
| In general, Toyota RAV4 are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Mitsubishi ASX. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 - 8.1 | 6.6 - 10.3 | |
|
Mitsubishi ASX petrol engines consumes on average 2.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Toyota RAV4. On average, Mitsubishi ASX equipped with diesel engines consume 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.40 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.70 m | |
|
Mitsubishi ASX is smaller. Mitsubishi ASX is 11 cm shorter than the Toyota RAV4, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi ASX is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 419 litres | 586 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1219 litres | 1470 litres | |
|
Toyota RAV4 has more luggage space. Mitsubishi ASX has 167 litres less trunk space than the Toyota RAV4. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota RAV4 (by 251 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi ASX is 0.4 metres more than that of the Toyota RAV4, which means Mitsubishi ASX can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 1`920 kg | ~ 2`134 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`385 kg | ~ 1`538 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 535 kg | ~ 596 kg | |
| Mitsubishi ASX load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 11 procentiem less than Toyota RAV4. Therefore, Toyota RAV4 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Average price (€): | 5800 | 4000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi ASX has
|
Toyota RAV4 has
| |