Mini Countryman 2020 vs Mazda CX-3 2018
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 178 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 280 NM | 207 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.3 seconds | 9.7 seconds | |
|
Mini Countryman is more dynamic to drive. Mini Countryman engine produces 28 HP more power than Mazda CX-3, whereas torque is 73 NM more than Mazda CX-3. Thanks to more power Mini Countryman reaches 100 km/h speed 2.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | 6.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.9 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km | |
|
By specification Mini Countryman consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-3, which means that by driving the Mini Countryman over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Mini Countryman consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-3. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 51 litres | 44 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 780 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
| 870 km on highway | 720 km on highway | ||
| 640 km with real consumption | 570 km with real consumption | ||
| Mini Countryman gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
| Ground clearance: | 165 mm (6.5 inches) | 155 mm (6.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mini Countryman can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
| Mazda CX-3 2018 2.0 engine: This engine is not well-suited for low-quality fuel, as it quickly clogs the fuel system. The use of substandard fuel often leads to the failure of expensive ignition coils, resulting in significant repair ... More about Mazda CX-3 2018 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.56 m | 1.54 m | |
|
Mini Countryman is larger. Mini Countryman is 2 cm longer than the Mazda CX-3, 6 cm wider, while the height of Mini Countryman is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 450 litres | 350 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1390 litres | 1260 litres | |
|
Mini Countryman has more luggage capacity. Mini Countryman has 100 litres more trunk space than the Mazda CX-3. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mini Countryman (by 130 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mini Countryman is 0.8 metres more than that of the Mazda CX-3, which means Mini Countryman can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`130 kg | 1`808 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`570 kg | 1`340 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 560 kg | 468 kg | |
| Mini Countryman load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 16 procentiem more than Mazda CX-3. Therefore, Mini Countryman is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 20 200 | 16 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mini Countryman has
|
Mazda CX-3 has
| |